• Skip to main content

Hearing Loss Treatment Report

www.HearingLossTreatmentReport.com

steroids

Intratympanic steroids for combined treatment of idiopathic sudden hearing loss: when is it too late?

May 24, 2019

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00016489.2019.1614222?journalCode=ioto20

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31124732?dopt=Abstract

Related Articles

Intratympanic steroids for combined treatment of idiopathic sudden hearing loss: when is it too late?

Acta Otolaryngol. 2019 May 24;:1-4

Authors: Amarillo E, Navarro A, Hernández-García E, Plaza G

Abstract

Background: Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) requires early treatment. Objective: To describe our experience on intratympanic steroid treatment (ITS) of ISSNHL analyzing the delay to start therapy as prognostic factor. Material and methods: We perform a retrospective study on ISSNHL treated with systemic steroids without full recovery on PTA (pure tone average) according to Siegel criteria. They were divided into two different groups: one group that additionally received ITS as combined therapy (treatment group), and another without it (control group). We analyzed the hearing recovery at 6 months and 2 years, and the influence of the delay to start ITS in the recovery. Results: After ITS was added, further complete recovery was achieved in 10 patients of the treatment group. After 6 months, PTA improvement in the treatment group was 10.84 dB, compared to 1.13 dB in the control group (p<.0001). Nevertheless, patients starting such combination of oral steroids and ITS within 8 days of diagnosis had an additional gain of 15 dB in the first 6 months, that increased to 19.17 dB after 24 months (p<.022). Conclusions: When ITS was added within the first 8 days, a significantly better and more stable response was obtained. PMID: 31124732 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Intratympanically Delivered Steroids Impact Thousands More Inner Ear Genes Than Systemic Delivery

May 15, 2019

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0003489419837562?journalCode=aora

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31092042?dopt=Abstract

Related Articles

Intratympanically Delivered Steroids Impact Thousands More Inner Ear Genes Than Systemic Delivery.

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2019 Jun;128(6_suppl):134S-138S

Authors: Trune DR, Shives KD, Hausman F, Kempton JB, MacArthur CJ, Choi D

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Glucocorticoids are given for sensorineural hearing loss, but little is known of their molecular impact on the inner ear. Furthermore, in spite of claims of improved hearing recovery with intratympanic delivery of steroids, no studies have actually documented the inner ear molecular functions that are enhanced with this delivery method.

METHODS: To assess steroid-driven processes in the inner ear, gene chip analyses were conducted on mice treated systemically with the glucocorticoids prednisolone or dexamethasone or the mineralocorticoid aldosterone. Other mice were given the same steroids intratympanically. Inner ears were harvested at 6 hours and processed on the Affymetrix 430 2.0 Gene Chip for expression of its 34 000 genes. Results were statistically analyzed for up or down expression of each gene against control (untreated) mice.

RESULTS: Analyses showed approximately 17 500 genes are normally expressed in the inner ear and steroids alter expression of 55% to 82% of these. Dexamethasone changed expression of 9424 (53.9%) inner ear genes following systemic injection but 14 899 ear genes (85%) if given intratympanically. A similar pattern was seen with prednisolone, as 7560 genes were impacted by oral delivery and 11 164 genes (63.8%) when given intratympanically. The mineralocorticoid aldosterone changed expression of only 268 inner ear genes if given orally, but this increased to 10 124 genes (57.9%) if injected intratympanically. Furthermore, the glucocorticoids given actually impacted more inner ear genes via the mineralocorticoid receptor than the glucocorticoid receptor.

CONCLUSIONS: Thousands of inner ear genes were affected by steroids, and this number increased significantly if steroids were delivered intratympanically. Also, the impact of glucocorticoids on inner ear mineralocorticoid functions is more substantial than previously known. Thus, the application of therapeutic steroids for hearing loss needs to be reassessed in light of their more comprehensive impact on inner ear genes. Furthermore, simply ascribing the efficacy of steroids to immunosuppression no longer appears to be warranted.

PMID: 31092042 [PubMed – in process]

Recovery From Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss May Be Linked to Chronic Stress Levels and Steroid Treatment Resistance

May 14, 2019

https://pubs.asha.org/doi/10.1044/2019_AJA-18-0127

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31084569?dopt=Abstract

Related Articles

Recovery From Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss May Be Linked to Chronic Stress Levels and Steroid Treatment Resistance.

Am J Audiol. 2019 May 14;:1-7

Authors: Ajduk J, Košec A, Kelava I, Ries M, Gregurić T, Kalogjera L

Abstract

Purpose This article investigates the possible connections between the level of chronic stress and success of steroid therapy in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). Method A single-center, retrospective, longitudinal cohort study on 55 patients in a tertiary referral otology center was examined. Patients diagnosed with SSNHL between 2014 and 2017 were asked to complete a Measure of Perceived Stress (Brajac, Tkalcic, Dragojević, & Gruber, 2003 ) questionnaire. Inclusion criteria were patients > 18 years of age, SSNHL diagnosed within 4 previous weeks, completed steroid treatment, and complete documentation. Results There were 30 patients (55%) that showed significant improvement in their pure-tone audiogram (PTA) hearing threshold average (≥ 15 dB) after steroid treatment. Two-step cluster analysis identified 3 clusters based on average PTA hearing threshold recovery and average Measure of Perceived Stress scores. The difference between pretreatment and posttreatment hearing levels was significantly higher in the cluster with moderate stress compared to clusters with mild and high stress levels (Kruskal-Wallis test, Friedman test, p < .001). There were no significant differences in average PTA hearing threshold recovery after steroid therapy between groups of patients with mild and severe stress. Conclusion Patients with moderate stress levels show significantly better results after steroid treatment for SSNHL than patients with low or high stress levels. PMID: 31084569 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Powered by Urgent Research

Copyright © 2025 Urgent Research